Since the 19th centuries, common prolonged existence or longevity is greater than before. At one time, the average male expected to live up until the mid forties, while the average female expected to live until the late forties. This seems illogical, since many of our older generation of people born in the 1900s are still around today. As our system advanced, experts found that people were living beyond the 70 and 80s. The longevity has changed dramatically providing the people gain. Still, in recent times, men are expected to live over 80 and women are expected to live past 90. Rarely do you see someone who has lived past 100 years of age. According to experts, a person living past 125 years of age has the same odds of finding a needle in a large haystack. Most people can live past 90 however providing they have quality medical care and their hereditary makeup is healthy.
Many illnesses today emerge from poor eating habits, lack of exercise, poor sleeping habits, and bad habits such as excessive drinking, drugs, nicotine, etc. Still, some people are marked at the beginning since they have genetic makeup that poses threats to their health. According to experts, genetic makeup is responsible for some cases of Alzheimer’s disease, heart disease, and so on. According to experts, genetics influences a person’s longevity. If a person has a family history of disease, their risks are higher of coming in contract with the same or similar disease. In short, if a person has a high risk of genetic factors, the person will likely have a shorter living expectancy.
How do doctors consider longevity? Doctors review family history to search for genetic factors that may show short or long life expectancy. If you have a history of diabetes, the doctor will take actions to reduce your risks, yet it may not help stop the disease. Doctors also consider your lifestyle. Do you smoke? Do you have an alcohol problem? Do you have drug problems? Do you have anorexia or bulimia? Do you exercise? If you answered no to each question, then likely you will live a longer and improved life. On the other hand, if you answered yes to these questions you can expect to live a shorter lifespan.
Doctors will also consider factors, such as environment when considering longevity. If you live in an area where toxins are high, likely you will have unnatural exposure to these toxins, which shortens your life. Even if your genetic makeup illustrates longevity, your environment plays part in how long you can live.
Doctors consider medical care. If you have a history of visiting your doctor often, then you will have a better chance at living healthy. Medical care is the process of reducing risks of disease, preventing disease and finding treatments for pending disease.
What you should know: Did you know that some types of not all cancers are curable providing the disease is spotted early? Did you know that Alzheimer’s disease is curable if the disease is caught in the early stages? Did you know that most diseases are curable, providing the disease is caught at an early stage?
If you know this, you will see that medical care is essential to live healthy while aging. Since the 19th centuries, medical experts have come along way. In addition, the experts continue to find ways to help people live a longer life. Doctors took their roles in life because they care about your health (at least most) therefore listen to the considerations that doctors focus on to help you live a healthy aging life.
Find tips about , and other information at the website.
The high/low diet is based upon many years of animal experimentation in my own laboratory at the U.C.L.A. Medical School and in other laboratories in other major universities in the United States. There is no doubt at all that the life span of animals can be extended by more than 50 percent by dietary means, corresponding to humans living to be 150 or 160 years old. I don’t actually expect quite to achieve this much life extension in humans. The necessary regimen would be too tough; but a less rigorous regimen will still add many years to your life, as well as life to your years. The former without the latter would not be so good, but the high/low dietary program promises both. The diet consists of food combinations and menus arrived at by computer techniques so that the Recommended Daily Allowances of all important nutrients are approximated with minimal caloric intake. The program calls for gradual weight loss over several years until you reach and remain at a new weight point substantially below your “set point.” Your set point is the weight toward which you naturally gravitate if you neither over nor undereat. Your new weight point, if you are on the proper nutritive program, is your point of maximum metabolic efficiency, maximum health, and maximum life span. (The high/low diet would also serve superbly well as a quick weight loss regimen, but I do not recommend such an undertaking, as it would be counterproductive in terms of good health and longevity.)
I will also tell you how to estimate your individual aging rate, as well as can be done with present techniques. You can then determine how well the program is working for you. And you will soon observe that you simply feel better. You will have more energy, and a clearer head, than ever before. The high/low diet is well founded scientifically. But evidence that taking fairly large amounts of certain vitamins, drugs, and chemicals will give an added boost to health and longevity varies from moderate to less than moderate. It does exist, however, and we must at least consider supplementation as a part of our longevity program. The proper types and amounts of exercise may yield additional advantages. We shall thus be discussing evidence at every order of probability. In consultation with your personal physician, you must finally decide which recommendations you want to adopt.
Michael Russell is a health specialist and has carried out research on many health related things, he also writes many too. If you found the above article useful he recommends you to visit his site at: for more related articles.
Hiring a La Mesa Exercise Expert will go a long way in helping you lose inches, build your physique and get into killer shape fast. The perfect trainer will be nationally certified with an accredited organization, such as ACE, ISSA, or NESTA, among others. Also, the right Exercise Expert, will have incredible experience with weight loss and muscle building.
A La Mesa Exercise Expert can help encourage you, guide you, guide you, push you beyond your limits, getting you the ultimate results possible. He will teach you every step of the way, making sure you are doing every exercise correctly and safely, so you don’t hurt yourself. This is important when looking to hire a Exercise Expert.
Your Exercise Expert should have you working out at least 5 days per week. He will also have you doing a smart and equalized nutrition guide that tastes delicious and is easy enough to follow. This is important so you have longevity and consistency.
A spectacular La Mesa Exercise Trainer will have you lifting weights on a regular basis. Lifting weights tightens your muscles, thus skyrocketing your metabolism, allowing you to burn more fat than ever. Also, you should be doing some extremely intense stop and go cardio, known as interval training.
A great example of interval training will be doing a series of sprints, where you dash 40 yards all out, then you walk back. As soon as you get back to the original starting position, you sprint all out again. This type of anaerobic cardio will kick your metabolism into high gear, melting the adipose tissue away.
Just take a look at a world class sprinter versus the marathon runner. Who looks leaner? Obvisously, the world class sprinter, because he does interval training, which in fact works the fast-twitch muscle fibers, the fibers that are more conducive to muscle growth and leaness.
A spectacular La Mesa Exercise Expert should also be high fun and professional. They should be on time and there to serve you. Never should he be a burden to you. Too many Exercise Experts in La Mesa talk about themselves and their clients get furious of it. You want someone who is there to push you and keep you motivated.
Last, but certainly not least. Your La Mesa Exercise Expert has to be in great shape himself. If he is out of shape or fat, there is no reason you should be allowing this trainer to help get you in awesome shape. After all, a fitness trainer who does not do what they preach should not be in business. So make sure your Exercise Expert plays the part and has your best interest at heart.
Follow these guidelines and you too will find yourself shedding fat, toning muscle, and looking better than ever in no time. Just by applying the correct method makes all the difference in the world from getting into amazing shape. La Mesa Exercise will work for you.
will have you in fantastic shape in no time. Once you start this be ready to work hard and get into great shape.Article Source:
It’s easy for me to find a well qualified medical doctor. Being a doctor myself, I know where to look, whom to ask, and what to ask for. But if I need a good lawyer or accountant, I feel a bit helpless. I may ask my friends. Probably they had asked their friends. The quest becomes a daisy chain, in which none of the participants really knows how to tell a good professional from a mediocre or even an inadequate one. They judge mainly on whether the practitioner has a pleasing and persuasive manner, whether he seems to know what he’s talking about. Clearly that’s not good enough. Finding a well qualified physician requires a little insight, but it’s easier than you think. Most physicians are members of the county medical society, although some doctors who are full time in medical schools may not bother to join. Call up the medical society in your vicinity. In Los Angeles, for example, you would find it listed as “Los Angeles County Medical Association.” Say you want to inquire about the availability and qualifications of physicians in your area of the city Hollywood, for example. The receptionist will connect you to the person who has that information. Say you are interested in finding a doctor in Hollywood who is a general practitioner, a specialist, or whatever it is you think you need. If you want an allÂaround doctor to give you an initial examination, to supervise you in a preventive health program such as mine, you probably want either a general practitioner or a physician certified by the Board of Internal Medicine. Ask for recommendations in that category.The county medical society will not recommend a specific person. Nor will it supply information on fees and such matters. But it will gladly give you a list of 4 or 5 practitioners located in your area and in good standing with the society. It will tell you where these physicians went to school, where they served their internships and residencies, how long they have been a member of the county society, and their hospital or medical school affiliations. If they are on the attending staff of a well known hospital Cedars Sinai Hospital in Los Angeles, for example that’s a plus. Being a member of the recently formed American College of Gerontology would also be a plus.Or if you do start by asking your friends, ask more than one. Compile a short list of physicians whom your friends recommend as attentive individuals. Then call the county society and ask for the credentials of these physicians: what medical schools they graduated from, and so on . Several orgaizations now publish lists of longevity doctors for different regions of the United States. None that I’ve seen has been very discriminating. The lists include a mishmash of M.D.s, some good, some borderline, plus chiropractors, nutritionists, acupuncturists, and so on. TherE are some good people in each of these categories, but you ought at least to know what type of basic credentials you are getting. For example, “Dr.” Robert Haas, author of the best selling book Eat to Win The Sports Nutrition Bible, is not a medical doctor at all. His “Dr.” is a Ph.D. from an unaccredited “university.”8 If that’s okay with you, it’s okay with me, but know what you are getting. The county medical society is apt to have information on M.D. and non M.D. alike. Seek out this information. Having selected a short list of possible practitioners by one of these methods, call them up. Ask what their fees are, and whether they are interested in preventive medicine, nutrition, and anti aging remedies. Don’t be bashful! If they don’t want to talk frankly, go elsewhere. Don’t tolerate the authoritarian mystique that has grown up around organized medicine. Ideally, you want somebody with satisfactory credentials and an open mind on the subject of anhagjng remedies. II he does not take the present book seriously because it .is a popular book for the lay public see if he has read or will read the book by Dr. Richard Weindruch and me, The Retardation of Aging by Dietary Restriction. Our book does not exactly parallel this one, but it’s close enough,and it is a fully documented, high tech science book. A biologIst physician may in part disagree with it, but he or she cannot avoid taking it seriously. And now you have your physician.Checkups And Biomarkers What Exactly To Do Or Have DoneThe General Status Examination ,Start the program with a general medical checkup. The precise nature of this will be up to your physician. It’s interesting that a task force of the Canadian Medical As sociation, reporting on a “cost effective” basis what the “periodic health examination” should consist of (in terms of how much hidden disease per dollar spent might be found in a population)9 recommended the following for symptom-free individuals: a blood pressure determination, examination of the mouth, evaluation of hearing, a test for possible hypothyroidism, and after age 45 a test for traces of blood in the stool. The task force specifically did not recommend a routine history and physical examination, any X-rays, any blood chemistries, urinalysis, or electro cardiograms. Since you want personalized service and are not part of a large scale “cost effective” screen, your physician will be correct in doing a history and physical examination, a urinalysis, and a test for anemia. I would not personally recommend any X rays, blood chemistries, or electro cardiograms, except those included under your “biomarker for aging” tests, unless something shows up on the history and physical examination.
Michael Russell is a health specialist and has carried out research on many health related things, he also writes many too. If you found the above article useful he recommends you to visit his site at: for more related articles.
Here we are, the year 2009 (soon to be 2010!), and it’s stunning to me that myths surrounding weight training and women still exist, and worse yet, it’s the same myths I was hearing a few decades ago! It seems I can dispel these myths ’til I’m blue in the face, and yet, they persist! In addition to the myths, it seems many women are simply unaware of the many benefits weight training ( also called resistance training or strength training) – can impart. Some of those benefits are sex specific in fact, that is, they are specific to women.
The following review below from the “THE PHYSICIAN AND SPORTS MEDICINE” (1) May issue covers the major myths, which are:
* Myth 1: Strength training causes women to become larger and heavier.
* Myth 2: Women should use different training methods than men.
* Myth 3: Women should avoid high-intensity or high-load training.
In addition to covering the myths, the review does a fine job of listing the benefits for women, which are:
* Enhanced bone modeling to increase bone strength and reduce the risk of osteoporosis
* Stronger connective tissues to increase joint stability and help prevent injury
* Increased functional strength for sports and daily activity
* Increased lean body mass and decreased nonfunctional body fat
* Higher metabolic rate because of an increase in muscle and a decrease in fat
* Improved self-esteem and confidence
Women Should Train With Weights. One benefit I think this report missed, is strength training reduces the risk of sarcopenia. Sarcopenia is an age related loss of muscle mass which negatively impacts health of men and women.
However, because women have less muscle mass to begin with, they are at a greater risk of sarcopenia as they age. I highly recommend women read my article on sarcopenia and how to avoid and or treat it. Most women are aware of osteoporosis -as it’s been drilled into their head via the media – but know little of sarcopenia, which is arguably more important to women than osteoporosis!
This recent review (1) on the importance of strength training for women with some old, yet enduring, myths debunked, is what’s needed to get the word out that women are missing an essential area for maintaining their health, weight, and figure:
“Although American women first began strength training for sports in the 1950s to improve their performance in track and field, they have traditionally participated in strength training less than men. Such exercise has not been considered feminine, and a lack of research and information regarding the effects of such training on women has made it a predominantly male activity. Women’s participation was particularly limited until 1972, when Title IX mandated equal access to educational programs-including athletics-for men and women in schools that receive federal funding. Since then, women’s sports participation has burgeoned, traditional gender roles have loosened, and strength training has grown in popularity among active women.”
See you in the gym ladies!
Strength Training for Women: Debunking Myths That Block Opportunity
William P. Ebben, MS, MSSW, CSCS; Randall L. Jensen, PhD
THE PHYSICIAN AND SPORTS MEDICINE – VOL 26 – NO. 5 – MAY
Want to lose weight, learn which supplements actually work, and save time and money while doing it? Find out more at See The Number One Science Based Web Site On All Things Health, Bodybuilding, Fitness, Longevity, and Weight loss: Article Source:
Anti Muscle Bias! As most know who have been weight lifting for more then a few years, there is a general anti muscle bias that exists in the general (read fat and lazy) population and the media. There is even something of an anti muscle bias in science and medicine I find, even when study after study shows having more muscle then the average person offers many advantages from a health and performance perspective.
Modern medical science has finally caught on to the reality that muscle tissue is much more then just something that attaches to your skeleton to help you move your body or carry your groceries. It’s an essential part of your health, intimately connected to immunity as well as a long list of other benefits. A perfect example of that was found in a recent report called “Men with big muscles cut cancer risk by 40 per cent” which covered an interesting study. From the media report:
“In recent years, experts have recommended a healthy diet and lifestyle – including regular aerobic exercise such as jogging or cycling to reduce the risks of the disease. But the latest study, published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, suggests it may be just as important to build up muscle strength. A team of experts, led by scientists from Sweden’s Karolinska Institute, tracked the lifestyles of 8,677 men aged between 20 and 82 for more than two decades.”
So far so good, and as the reader can see, a large study that ran a long time. The study found those men who regularly worked out showed significantly lower rates of cancer, and most interesting was the effect was constant “…Even among volunteers who had excess tummy fat or a high body mass index, regular weight training seemed to have a protective effect.”
However, and as one should expect, these researchers stressed keeping a healthy weight was still an essential part of avoiding various diseases. The researchers recommend regular weight training in light of these findings. But then, that odd anti muscle bias seems to creep in. Ergo, a spokesman for Cancer Research UK Health information officer Jessica Harris is quoted as saying “There’s no need to become a body builder. Just 30 minutes of moderate exercise five times a week that leaves you warm and slightly out of breath can have a positive effect.”
There’s so many things wrong with the above, it’s hard to know where to start, but here’s some thoughts:
? There’s a looooooooooong way, time, and effort, between being a “bodybuilder” and “30 minutes of moderate exercise five times a week that leaves you warm and slightly out of breath.”
? As anyone who has spent any time in a gym knows (and we all know that eliminates most scientists but I digress…) building muscle is not easy, so “30 minutes of moderate exercise five times a week that leaves you warm and slightly out of breath” is not going to do jack you-know-what for actually increasing muscle mass. In fact, it may not even prevent the loss of muscle mass that happens with age, a condition known as sarcopenia. People interested in learning more about sarcopenia, can read my article on the topic called:” Sarcopenia, the undiagnosed epidemic”
? No doubt, 30 minutes of moderate exercise five times a week “that leaves you warm and slightly out of breath” is far more then most people get now, and would improve their health, but as it relates specifically to the findings of this study, the advice totally misses the mark in my view. The fact is, if a person is looking to actually have any real impact on muscle mass, they need to work with a minimum of 60% 1RM for beginners, and 80% 1RM for anything beyond beginners, on a regular basis. The data is quite clear on that fact, so some low intensity exercise that leaves one “warm and slightly out of breath” done for 30 minutes is advice that smacks of typical anti muscle bias found in much of the science/medical community and the media. It’s either bias, flat out ignorance, or both…God forbid, they may lift some heavy weights and end up looking like a bodybuilder!
? I’m sure the medical/scientific community does not want to scare people away from resistance exercise (e.g., weight training) by actually admitting they will have to work hard in the gym to actually see any effects on muscle mass and strength, but giving people faulty advice that will not lead to the results they want does not seem like a productive way to accomplish anything other then to confuse people.
? I know hard work is a four letter word these days, but there’s no free lunch, there’s no Santa, no Easter Bunny, and getting the known health benefits of muscle mass (not to mention the aesthetic benefits!) does in fact take dedication, a bit of thought and planning, and – sorry to say- hard work with loads/weights heavy enough to kick your a$$. Lifting a beer to my mouth a hundred times will leave some “warm and slightly out of breath” but it aint going to build any muscles!
See you in the gym
Want to gain muscle, strength, and save time and money while doing it? Find out more at See The Number One Science Based Web Site On All Things Health, Bodybuilding, Fitness, Longevity, and Weight loss: Article Source:
A fairly recent article in the Journal of Special Operations Medicine (JSOM)* examined the Musculoskeletal injuries from 5th group. The military is starting to catch onto the fact that their troops, in particular their special operations troops, would improve their operational effectiveness while reducing rates of injury by taking advantage of some of the training being used in the athletic world.
The authors decided to quantify the rates and types of these injuries in SF using the records from 5th group, “who treated numerous middle-aged team sergeants with shoulder, back, and knee overuse injuries”
The authors noted “Special Forces, and Ranger units are about 10 to 12 injuries per 100 Soldier-months, which is comparable to collegiate endurance athletes. Of all the types of units studied, Special Forces has the highest incidence of injury rate at 12.1 per 100 Soldier-months.”
This study revealed that physical training caused 50% of all injuries, and 30% were linked to running. Injuries resulted in 10-times the number of profile days (lost work days) as illnesses with the leading reason for outpatient visits in our Group was for musculoskeletal disorders.
The locations of affected musculoskeletal conditions in descending order include: back/neck (31%), ankle (10%), shoulder (10%), and knee (10%).
The authors found that “…over 40% of all clinical diagnoses in the 5th Group Clinic were for musculoskeletal problems.” This translated into injured members of 5th group being put on “light duty” an average of 20 to 30 days each which has “significant” operational impact on the unit.
It was interesting to note that in other army units studied, musculoskeletal injuries are more common in the lower extremities (e.g., knees and ankles) but in SF, upper extremity injuries (e.g., lower back, upper back, shoulders, etc) are more common. The authors theorized “This may be due to the slightly older average age of our Soldiers versus conventional units, in addition to the cumulative effect of repetitive micro trauma from airborne operations, combatives training, wearing heavy body armor, and carrying heavy loads.”
This article covered a bunch of additional info about injury rates and other details interested parties (trainers, docs, etc) can look up the full article for additional details there. Of most interest to me, was their comments on prevention:
“Finally to focus more on prevention, Special Forces Groups should modify unit physical training programs to incorporate the fitness and performance fundamentals used in today’s top athletic programs. Military researchers have shown that modified physical training programs can result in lower injury rates with improvements in physical fitness. Training regimens that emphasize core strength and cross-training would likely increase physical readiness while decreasing the incidence of spine and lower extremity injuries.”
I agree with all of the above. As mentioned, training hard and training smart, are not always the same thing. The latter leading to greater performance and reduced injury rates, with improved operational readiness and (potentially) greater operational longevity for the SF soldier. The top coaches involved in “today’s top athletic programs” follow similar guidelines I mentioned regarding programs that follow a wave form pattern vs. a linear pattern I had mentioned in other articles.
I’m happy to see the medical and training community within the SOF community is starting to see the benefits in both performance -and reduced rates of injuries – following more modern concepts in training already being utilized by the top athletic programs and or coaches in the field. The authors finished their report by summing it up nicely:
“By making these changes to training and resourcing, Special Forces Groups will be investing in our most lethal weapon-the individual Special Forces Soldier.”
Both athletes, military, and law enforcement, can learn from this info and should take advantage of the most recent developments in strength & conditioning science.
* Clinical Diagnoses in a Special Forces Group: The Musculoskeletal Burden – James H. Lynch, MD, MS and Mark P. Pallis, DO, FAAOS. Journal of Special Operations Medicine (JSOM): Volume 8, Edition 2 / Spring 2008, 76-79
Will Brink’s site dedicated to the performance and health of Tactical LEO/SWAT: For all things health, fitness, and bodybuilding: Article Source:
Who else is interested in learning more about the health benefits of acai berry? If you are like me….the truth is, you’re probably interested in ANYTHING that has to do with alternative wellness, health, healing and simply living your best and most authentic purpose. And if you’ve been watching the news over the past few years, you’d have to be blind to miss the veritable cacophony of content on acai berry….the Amazonian super fruit that has taken off like a rocket in Western alternative health circles.
But how many of the beautiful benefits this little berry promises are REAL…and how much is simply hype? The truth is, unfortunately, whenever ANYTHING makes as big of a splash as acai has…the manipulative marketers come out of the woodwork, and end up destroying and casting DOUBT on some of the AMAZING (and authentic) benefits that are to be had.
Filed Under: Acai Berry and Antioxidants
The truth is that acai has just about the highest concentration of important anti-oxidants of any fruit in the world. From an ORAC standpoint (the metric of measurement most often cited) acai exceeds (often exponentially) some of the most commonly accepted super fruits in the world.
Blueberries, blackberries, strawberries, cherries, pomegranates and more are dwarfed by the values that acai offers….and this remains widely without dispute. Want the truth? According to some experts, acai has 30 times the anthocyanins (powerful phyto-chemicals) found in red wine and olive oil, and have NONE of the harmful side effects that overindulgence in the latter can bring. (as too much alcohol, or calories can KILL you, rather than cure!)
Filed Under: Anthocyanins and Longevity, Health and Optimum Wellness
One of the most amazing aspects of the benefits of acai is the cutting edge research being done with anthocyanins and a whole host of age (and heart) related diseases. While these powerful anti-oxidants are already proven to be beneficial for all sorts of heart related preventative medicine, (helping with circulation, cardiovascular health and preventing the hardening of arteries) more recent studies ALSO show they may be responsible for preventing some forms of cancer on a molecular level…which is very exciting to say the least!
The Bottom Line?
Much of the ant-aging and fountain of youth movements seem to believe that these sort of anti-oxidants WILL be the key to reversing many common diseases, and the fact is, acai is BOUNTIFUL in both of them!
Bonus Tip: Beware of the Acai Berry Scams! Unfortunately, many of the Acai products on the market are scams, being sold by unscrupulous companies with one hand in your pocket, rather than out to help you heal.
My best advice? If you really want to experience the amazing benefits of acai, make sure you ONLY buy extract.
(This is the online in our opinion, and the one that we use, and recommend to our family, friends and readers alike.)
Breast Gain | admin January 26, 2010 | 
Comments (0) 
